Reading on Writing (p.
98-109)
Reading Response
“Materiality and Genre in the Study of
Discourse Communities”
by Amy Devitt, Anis Bawarshi, and Mary
Reiff
Summary:
In
“Materiality and Genre in the Study of Discourse Communities,” the three authors
attempt to explain how genre analysis can help in understanding discourse
communities. They argue that, “Genre study allows students and researchers to recognize how ‘lived
textuality’ plays a role in the lived experience of a group. Teaching students
how to analyze genres can provide discipline and focus to the study of
discourse communities” (98). Three essays are provided as examples.
Devitt
explains the legal genre of jury instruction and argues that there is a disconnect
between the creators of communal agendas and the interests of those who use
them. Devitt describes the separation between specialists and non-specialists;
members and non-members. Devitt believes some language in jury instruction contains words such as "aggravating," "mitigating," "and "might," that members require but nonmembers maybe be confused by. Although Devitt has personally tried to rewrite the
particular genre of jury instructions to better inform nonmembers (users), she also
recognizes that such language protects the community and the values of its
members (judges, lawyers). Two other examples that Devitt provides are tax forms and voting ballots.
Bawarshi explains the medical genre of the Patient Medical History
Form, or the form of life. She argues that “Genre analysis gives access to the
workings of discourse communities in a way that renders the idea of a discourse
community a more tangible, helpful concept for teachers, students, and
researchers” (104). Bawarshi explains how the medical forms allow the patient
to enter into that genre by providing their personal information but they may
not particularly agree with its values (a knee injury v. a person with a knee
injury). Also, the mental state of the patient may not be considered material and thus people don't report it and proper treatment may be overrated.
Reiff explains ethnography. She describes it as both a research
genre an approach to genre analysis. Reiff argues that ethnographic study
allows one to “compose communities while composing in communities” (109). Reiff
tells about three main teaching interests that can be achieved through ethnographic
study: learning genres, learning about genres, and learning through genres.
(Susan, a pre-law student, is provided as an example for a mini-ethnography
that consists of those three goals).
How does Devitt show that being a specialist and non-specialist can cause problems? What specific example is provided?
ReplyDeleteAs I stated above in an example, nonmembers were confused by the language provided by members (non-specialist affected by specialist). The verdict may be affected by what the jury interprets the instructions to be rather than what the lawyer would expect based on the same set of instructions.
Delete