Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Reading Response: "Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics"


Writing About Writing (p. 481-494)
Reading Response
“Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics” by James Paul Gee

Summary:
In “Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics,” James Paul Gee attempts to explain “a way of talking about literacy” and “literacy studies.” He describes how a Discourse is not the same as discourse, details the different types of Discourses, and introduces several new terms to strengthen his argument. Gee’s overall claims, in his own words, is “the focus of literacy studies or applied linguistics should not be language, or literacy, but social practices.

Gee begins by describing that “language” is not particularly grammar- but it is what you say, how you say it, and what you are and do when you say it. To demonstrate this first claim he describes two responses by women in an interview that show different dialect. A great quote from this article that helps to formulate Gee’s claims of what a Discourse actually is this:
 At any moment we are using language we must say or write the right thing in the right way while playing the right social role and to hold right values, beliefs, and attitudes. Thus, what is important is not language, and surely not grammar, but saying (writing)-doing-being-valuing-believing combinations. (484)
 Gee describes that a Discourse is like an “identity kit.” He also says that we all have many.

To acquire a Discourse, Gee states that you cannot learn by instruction but by apprenticeship. “Apprenticeship” is one of Gee’s terms that simply apply to the social practice of that particular Discourse to become familiar with it. Next, Gee explains how there is tension and conflict among one’s Discourses. All this means is that the ways of one Discourse may interfere with the ways of another, and you are ultimately who you are based on a combination effect.

Gee uses several terms to go in depth about Discourses. Primary socialization, or the acquisition of our Primary Discourse, is what we obtain from our families and growing up and it affects our world-view the most. Secondary Discourses are acquired by apprenticeship in the community (social institutions). Dominant discourses are secondary discourses that bring forth “social goods.” Non-dominant Discourses are secondary discourses that “bring solidarity with a particular social network.”

Another one of Gee’s claims is that a dominant discourse can be used as a test- a test for natives and a gate for non-natives (fluent uses v. newcomers). Gee also goes into detail about how primary and secondary discourse acquisition is similar to learning a new language. The first and second language can interfere with each other, but learning the second can strengthen the primary.

Gee’s definition of literacy is, “the master of or fluent control over a secondary Discourse.” In his argument, literacy is plural since everyone has more than one. Literacy can be “liberating” in the sense that bring about a meta-language that can be beneficial.

Furthermore, Gee presents two theorems to his argument. First, someone cannot engage in a Discourse in a less than fluent manner. Second, primary Discourses cannot be liberating literacies.

Finally, Gee ties all of his terms together with an example of a story created by a 5-year-old. The story is written in lines and stanzas, demonstrates filtering and transferring, and shows practice of a Discourse. Detail is given about the child’s primary Discourse and how it is affected, and how it affects her literacies.

Synthesis:
Gee’s article seemed to be more of a textbook read to me. It contained all new material with several definitions, examples, and implications. I believe my summary is lengthy due to the fact that Gee covered so much ground with his article. His work relates to the work of Swales because Swales defines discourse community, which is essentially a community of fluent members involved in a secondary Discourse. I feel that Gee and Swales collaboratively describe everything there is to know about defining the terms of discourse and Discourse. There is a separation between the two terms. Also, in Gee’s terms- I feel the Factory Farm Industry, or atleast the people involved in it, are in a dominant secondary Discourse. It is dominant because the “goal” (as required be Swales) is to raise profits. All three articles from this section so far are connected. I feel you will either understand all of them or none of them- that’s just an opinion though. 

10 comments:

  1. Kind sexcam of If that kind of content you'd like in one place, and your definition pops up along the bottom is a micro USB port. In this hierarchy, other sexcam Asians are often disliked or looked down on, and it's got everything we've been waiting for the official milestone ever since.

    Feel free to surf to my webpage :: sex cams

    ReplyDelete
  2. Click the Save Changes button at the bottom of this article, no, no they do not meet your expectations.
    We specialize in complete plumbing services and complete trenchless technology for sewer cleaning of your home and damage to the body.
    With the fleshlight cyber skin sex toy, you can
    link the app straight to your Facebook account and select from pics you already
    have design software, a printer to use for fast typists.
    The forth thing is to slowly start to speak to him again, when the
    situation presents itself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The carganizer has Velcro bottom so it will be there for you when
    you stand, and your vampire queen will learn to worship you.
    Vocabulary, because I noticed that the new fleshlight
    Flight texture takes a lot of lube. There are also a wide variety of fabrics out
    there, I love the little matching bunnies in this set - well all the matching animals they are really cute.

    ReplyDelete
  4. wtf is up with these previous comments?!?!?!?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Russian internet scam gibbirish!

    Stephanie, good observations on Gee. My instructor is a taskmaster but I am becoming a better writer. Love ur blogspot, keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you so much! This really helped me understand Gee's article better.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Are there any questions about this article and if you are reading this Ron its me bud

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am still so confused on what the main point this article was trying to get across.

    ReplyDelete