Writing About Writing
Reading Response
“Identity, Authority,
and learning to Write in New Workplaces” by Elizabeth Wardle
Summary:
In “Identity, Authority, and
learning to Write in New Workplaces,” Elizabeth Wardle attempts to explain how
identity and authority issues affect the process of enculturation for workers
in new environments. Wardle argues that the issues of identity and authority
can affect one’s assimilation in a new working environment and that
miscommunication with the two can lead to one being viewed as a “tool” and
stress.
To start, Wardle describes modern
socio-historic theories describing identity and authority. She details the Activity
Theory by David Russell, which says that as one encounters new activity systems
they encounter new genres and must determine how and when or if to use them.
Wardle notes that an activity system is essentially a discourse community. She
also describes Etienne Wegner’s theory that details three interrelated modes of
belonging: engagement, imagination, and alignment. Engagement can me negative
or positive and is where newcomers and experts interact. Negative engagement
for Wardle is called non-participation and it can marginalize the workplace.
Imagination can enable a sense of belonging but can also cause disconnect if
the imagination is not similar to the reality. Alignment is where the new comer
aligns with the new discourse they are in. Basically, positive communication
and effort on the behalf of both the newcomer and the existing workers is
necessary for the newcomer’s success in the new workplace. For authority,
Wardle expands on Wegner’s theory. Wardle claims that authority is an
intangible thing but is nonetheless granted within institutions. She states
that clear job position separation is necessary to avoid confusion of
authority. When there is confusion, imagination can get in the way of
alignment.
To end, Wardle presents a case
study of sorts. She tells about Alan the computer specialist. He began working
after graduating college in a department that he felt he had no authority in.
He then worked for the department of the college from which he graduated. He
claimed he was a “God” here and assumed that his only boss was the department chair.
He sent vast emails regularly but lacked the language that the members of the
department required. He eventually because the joke of the department and the
other members in the activity system did not view his prestige in the same way
he did. Alan’s story portrayed that the engagement process was flawed and
combining that with his false imagination about his authority led to improper
alignment in the workplace. Wardle used Alan to show that learning to write in
new environments can require more than just new skills and ways of thinking- it
requires involvement, understanding power, and effort to assimilate with the
other members.
great summary. thanks for making this article understandable. please proof read i found several grammatical and spelling errors.
ReplyDeleteTerrible comment. Please proofread because I found several grammatical and spelling errors.
DeleteCalm down grammar Nazis.
ReplyDelete